{"id":11734,"date":"2019-12-23T09:39:21","date_gmt":"2019-12-23T09:39:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/reri-submitted-requests-for-official-recognition-on-permit-validity-cessation-of-small-hydropower-plants-in-topli-do-and-prokuplje\/"},"modified":"2023-05-20T10:01:49","modified_gmt":"2023-05-20T10:01:49","slug":"reri-submitted-requests-for-official-recognition-on-permit-validity-cessation-of-small-hydropower-plants-in-topli-do-and-prokuplje","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/reri-submitted-requests-for-official-recognition-on-permit-validity-cessation-of-small-hydropower-plants-in-topli-do-and-prokuplje\/","title":{"rendered":"RERI Submitted Requests for Official Recognition on Permit Validity Cessation of Small Hydropower Plants in Topli Do and Prokuplje"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignwide\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"478\" height=\"244\" src=\"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/10792-prokuplje_serbia_europe_7.05.2012_2-1-e1579772479455.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1264\" srcset=\"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/10792-prokuplje_serbia_europe_7.05.2012_2-1-e1579772479455.jpg 478w, https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/10792-prokuplje_serbia_europe_7.05.2012_2-1-e1579772479455-400x204.jpg 400w, https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/10792-prokuplje_serbia_europe_7.05.2012_2-1-e1579772479455-370x189.jpg 370w, https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/10792-prokuplje_serbia_europe_7.05.2012_2-1-e1579772479455-387x198.jpg 387w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 478px) 100vw, 478px\" \/><figcaption> Photo: Prokuplje | www.aurora.ekof.bg.ac.rs <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Renewables and Environmental Regulatory Institute (RERI) have submitted requests to competent administrative authority about building permits for the construction of the small hydropower plant \u201cTopli Dol 1\u201d in the village Topli Do (municipality of Pirot), as well as for SHPP \u201cRastovnica\u201d in the municipality of Prokuplje.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RERI submitted request to the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure on 21.10.2019. about building permit issued to Gornjak d.o.o. Belgrade, for the construction of SHPP \u201cTop Dol 1\u201d. Building permit for SHPP \u201cTopli Dol 1\u201d, issued 23.08.2017. (effective from 11.10.2017), it has ceased to be valid for two years from the date of its validity, according to the Law on Planning and Construction, which was valid at the time of issuance of the permit, as well as the validity period specified in the permit itself and the fact that the investor did not start construction work within this period.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition, RERI (with similar argument) submitted a request to the Municipal Administration of the Municipality of Prokuplje on 17.12.2019. to make decision in which to state annulment of a building permit, which was issued to an investor on December 2015 for the construction of a small hydropower plant on three rivers- Dobroti\u0107, Bal\u010da\u010dka and Bu\u010dinska in municipality of Prokuplje. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The competent authorities \u2013 construction inspection services, in both cases did not comply with the regulations, and did not (despite RERI\u2019s request) timely enter the field to determine the facts- conclude that the investors did not start the works within the legal deadline, <strong>RERI hired an expert in the construction profession, who in both cases produced findings and opinions, stating the factual situation on the ground, explicitly stating that the investors had not started the works within the legal deadline, and accordingly the relevant building permits ceased to be valid. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RERI in support of the above, and as additional evidence applicable in both cases, also transfers the opinion of the Ministry given in the second-instance procedure for revoking the building permit for the construction of SHPP Ro\u010dnjak, town of Uzice (which RERI also initiated), in which confirms the interpretation of the RERI legal team. In the present cases, this can be used as a good example of the practice and correct interpretation of regulations by the competent authority, which in the specific two cases would require the adoption of an identical decision \u2013 revocation of building permits. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>In accordance with the submitted evidence and argumentation, RERI is of the opinion that the competent authorities in a particular case can only make one correct and legally based decision, by adopting a formal decision only to state the facts and confirm the opinion of the Ministry \u2013 that the adoption of such a decision has only declarative. , not constitutive status; BUILDING PERMITS ceased to be valid under the law and with the passage of time, AND BY MAKING THE APPROPRIATE DECISION THIS FACT IS ONLY ASCERTAIN. <\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Renewables and Environmental Regulatory Institute (RERI) have submitted requests to competent administrative authority about building permits for the construction of\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":1264,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_EventAllDay":false,"_EventTimezone":"","_EventStartDate":"","_EventEndDate":"","_EventStartDateUTC":"","_EventEndDateUTC":"","_EventShowMap":false,"_EventShowMapLink":false,"_EventURL":"","_EventCost":"","_EventCostDescription":"","_EventCurrencySymbol":"","_EventCurrencyCode":"","_EventCurrencyPosition":"","_EventDateTimeSeparator":"","_EventTimeRangeSeparator":"","_EventOrganizerID":[],"_EventVenueID":[],"_OrganizerEmail":"","_OrganizerPhone":"","_OrganizerWebsite":"","_VenueAddress":"","_VenueCity":"","_VenueCountry":"","_VenueProvince":"","_VenueState":"","_VenueZip":"","_VenuePhone":"","_VenueURL":"","_VenueStateProvince":"","_VenueLat":"","_VenueLng":"","_VenueShowMap":false,"_VenueShowMapLink":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1545,971,974,913],"tags":[873,908,972,843,979,975],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11734"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11734"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11734\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11820,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11734\/revisions\/11820"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reri.org.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}